63% Use Text Messaging

63% use text messaging.

63% use text messaging.

According to a report by ComScore, Americans are using their mobile phones more than ever before.

  • 63% used text messaging.
  • 30.1% used mobile browsers.
  • 28.6% downloaded apps.

(Source — ComScore; March ‘10)

One Response to “63% Use Text Messaging”

  1. Bert Rackett Says:

    When will we realize that SMS is a toy. Whip
    it out of your pocket, press 160 keys (or 200 if
    your thumb is too fat). WHEEEEEE!
    It’s turning the world into hordes of haiku
    scribblers, destroying the English language and
    replacing it with a dictionary of perversions.
    The sad part is that almost by definition the
    messages are too short to really communicate
    anything. “Hi Joe! I’m at Walmart.” How did we
    ever do without it?
    Why are the messages so short? The people
    selling the service have tower control channels
    that are always active, and have lots of extra
    capacity. So much that more than a trillion
    micromessages can be carried without adding
    communication costs. And the service providers
    will make thirty billion dollars in 2010
    providing the service. Average cost per message,
    14.7 cents.
    I don’t have a PhD, but I’ve done most of
    the engineering design for a desk landline
    telephone stand. It has a forty character
    display, a little drawer containing a folded
    full size keyboard, and software that allows
    creating and editing text of any length. When
    you like what you’ve written (with ten fingers),
    place a call, press a function key and HMMMMM,
    off goes your text, perhaps 900 words per minute.
    Is it private? Press another function key and
    only someone with your key can read it. The
    message is sent with audio signals,
    and a voice channel can carry it without any
    additional fees. You purchase the device, and
    never have to pay an additional dime. If you
    have “Moby Dick” on a USB memory stick, plug it
    in, press a button, and it’s sent to someone’s
    memory. All this with no computer and no
    internet access. A five dollar microprocessor
    does all the work.
    My question is, why isn’t such a device
    available? It could have been built in the
    sixties. My second question is, why can’t I
    interest anyone in developing it?

Leave a Reply