<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 63% Use Text Messaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.textmessageblog.mobi/2010/08/10/text-messaging-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.textmessageblog.mobi/2010/08/10/text-messaging-use/</link>
	<description>The Text Message Blog gives the reader information about the world of text messages and mobile marketing and their use by media and advertisers as promotional tools.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bert Rackett</title>
		<link>http://www.textmessageblog.mobi/2010/08/10/text-messaging-use/#comment-4025</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Rackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.textmessageblog.mobi/?p=1362#comment-4025</guid>
		<description>When will we realize that SMS is a toy. Whip 
it out of your pocket, press 160 keys (or 200 if 
your thumb is too fat). WHEEEEEE!
     It's turning the world into hordes of haiku 
scribblers, destroying the English language and 
replacing it with a dictionary of perversions. 
The sad part is that almost by definition the 
messages are too short to really communicate 
anything. "Hi Joe! I'm at Walmart." How did we 
ever do without it?
     Why are the messages so short? The people 
selling the service have tower control channels 
that are always active, and have lots of extra 
capacity. So much that more than a trillion 
micromessages can be carried without adding 
communication costs. And the service providers 
will make thirty billion dollars in 2010 
providing the service. Average cost per message, 
14.7 cents.
     I don't have a PhD, but I've done most of 
the engineering design for a desk landline 
telephone stand. It has a forty character 
display, a little drawer containing a folded 
full size keyboard, and software that allows 
creating and editing text of any length. When 
you like what you've written (with ten fingers), 
place a call, press a function key and HMMMMM, 
off goes your text, perhaps 900 words per minute.
Is it private? Press another function key and 
only someone with your key can read it. The 
message is sent with audio signals, 
and a voice channel can carry it without any 
additional fees. You purchase the device, and 
never have to pay an additional dime. If you 
have  "Moby Dick" on a USB memory stick, plug it 
in, press a button, and it's sent to someone's 
memory. All this with no computer and no 
internet access. A five dollar microprocessor 
does all the work.
     My question is, why isn't such a device 
available? It could have been built in the 
sixties. My second question is, why can't I 
interest anyone in developing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will we realize that SMS is a toy. Whip<br />
it out of your pocket, press 160 keys (or 200 if<br />
your thumb is too fat). WHEEEEEE!<br />
     It&#8217;s turning the world into hordes of haiku<br />
scribblers, destroying the English language and<br />
replacing it with a dictionary of perversions.<br />
The sad part is that almost by definition the<br />
messages are too short to really communicate<br />
anything. &#8220;Hi Joe! I&#8217;m at Walmart.&#8221; How did we<br />
ever do without it?<br />
     Why are the messages so short? The people<br />
selling the service have tower control channels<br />
that are always active, and have lots of extra<br />
capacity. So much that more than a trillion<br />
micromessages can be carried without adding<br />
communication costs. And the service providers<br />
will make thirty billion dollars in 2010<br />
providing the service. Average cost per message,<br />
14.7 cents.<br />
     I don&#8217;t have a PhD, but I&#8217;ve done most of<br />
the engineering design for a desk landline<br />
telephone stand. It has a forty character<br />
display, a little drawer containing a folded<br />
full size keyboard, and software that allows<br />
creating and editing text of any length. When<br />
you like what you&#8217;ve written (with ten fingers),<br />
place a call, press a function key and HMMMMM,<br />
off goes your text, perhaps 900 words per minute.<br />
Is it private? Press another function key and<br />
only someone with your key can read it. The<br />
message is sent with audio signals,<br />
and a voice channel can carry it without any<br />
additional fees. You purchase the device, and<br />
never have to pay an additional dime. If you<br />
have  &#8220;Moby Dick&#8221; on a USB memory stick, plug it<br />
in, press a button, and it&#8217;s sent to someone&#8217;s<br />
memory. All this with no computer and no<br />
internet access. A five dollar microprocessor<br />
does all the work.<br />
     My question is, why isn&#8217;t such a device<br />
available? It could have been built in the<br />
sixties. My second question is, why can&#8217;t I<br />
interest anyone in developing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

